Just as per rabbi may not permit that which is forbidden, so must he be careful not puro forbid that which is permitted. Therefore, if verso rabbi must forbid something merely because of per question of law, because of verso custom, or because of special circumstances, he must state his reason so as not preciso establish an erroneous precedent.
Nevertheless, it is forbidden for per city preciso split into two congregations primarily because of a dispute over law or practice
Per rabbi should be careful not sicuro render an unusual or anomalous decision, unless he carefully explains the reasons for it. Therefore, any uncommon decision that depends on subtle or esoteric reasoning should not be publicized, lest it lead preciso erroneous conclusions. It is for this reason that there are cases which are permitted only sopra our teen network app gratuita the case of per scholar, and which may not be taught puro the ignorant.
When per rabbi renders per decision per per case in which there are no clear precedents, he must strive sicuro bring as many proofs as possible…
When verso rabbi renders a decision mediante verso question of law, the Torah recognizes it as binding. Therefore, when a rabbi decides on a case and forbids something, it becomes intrinsically forbidden.
Since the initial decision renders the subject of verso case intrinsically forbidden, it cannot be permitted even by a greater sage or by verso majority rule.
An erroneous decision cannot render a case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if a second rabbi is able sicuro esibizione that the original decision is refuted by generally accepted authorities or codes, he may reverse the original decision.
Similarly, verso decision that is retracted with good reason does not render per case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if per second rabbi is able esatto determine that common practice traditionally opposes the initial ong authorities, he may convince the first rabbi preciso retract his decision and permit the case mediante question. Individual logic and judgment, however, are not considered sufficient reason for a rabbi preciso reverse even his own decision…
Sopra order esatto prevent controversy, one should not present per case before a rabbi without informing him of any previous decisions associated with that particular case.
One rabbi can overturn the decision of another only if he can prove the initial decision onesto be erroneous
Although the Torah demands verso insecable degree of uniformity con practice, it does recognize geographical differences. Therefore, different communities may follow varying opinions sopra minor questions of Torah law.
However, where there is giammai geographical or similar justification for varied practices, such differences are liable to be associated with ideological divergences and are forbidden. Within verso celibe community, the Torah requires verso high degree of uniformity con religious practice. Mediante no case should it be made esatto appear that there is more than one Torah.
It is written, “You are children of God your Lord; you must not mutilate yourselves (lo tit-godedu)” (Deut. 14:1). Just as it is forbidden preciso mutilate one’s body, so is it prohibited preciso mutilate the body of Judaism by dividing it into factions. Sicuro do so is preciso disaffirm the universal fatherhood of God and the unity of His Torah.
It is therefore forbidden for members of verso single congregation puro form factions, each following a different practice or opinion. It is likewise forbidden for per scapolo rabbinical trapu sicuro issue a split decision.
However, where per city has more than one congregation, or more than one rabbinical court, the following of each one is counted as per separate community, and each one may follow different practices.